- Pen to Print: A Conversation with Tony Ballantyne and Eithne Cullen
- Thursday 18th November 2021 13:00-15:00
I’ll be reading from and talking about Midway, and leading a writing exercise in the session.
SF and Fantasy Writer
I’ll be reading from and talking about Midway, and leading a writing exercise in the session.
The mission of the MyKitaab podcast series is to help answer the question “I have written a book, how do I get it published in India?”
Here, host Amar Vyas talks to me about writing, blogging and Open Source software, especially Emacs!
You can access the podcast as follows:
Or listen to it here:
The first in a new series on Concatenation. I found this a really interesting article to write.
Follow the link: http://www.concatenation.org/science/ballantyne_scientist.html
Thanks to Chris Beckett – Arthur C Clarke aware winning author of Dark Eden and too many excellent short stories – I’m a link in a chain. The idea is that writers answer four questions on their blog and then nominate one or two other writers to do the same thing. You can see Chris’s answers here.
And here are mine:
I’m just completing Cosmompolitan Predators! for Aethernet Magazine, after which I’ll begin Dream Paris, the followup to Dream London. I’m also working on a series of stories set in the Recursion universe, the first of which will be appearing in print soon. And lastly, Penrose 3 continues its slow progress towards completion
How does it differ? I must admit, I’m more fascinated by the similarities. What is it about a genre that means you can take two very different works like, for example, the Foundation Trilogy and The Handmaid’s Tale and say that yes, these are both SF (even if one of the authors may claim otherwise… ).
As for differences? I don’t write heroes, I tend not to write competent people. I’ve always been struck by a line in a Pulp song “Do you want to see how common people fail?”. Golden age SF featured competent scientists and engineers solving problems. Those were great stories, but the protagonists never struck me as being particularly authentic or representative.
There are problems to be solved in my stories, there is (I hope) fascinating technology, but the protagonists don’t understand how things work, there are no easy answers. I don’t write about sewer operators saving the Earth, I write about how groups of people make a difference, sometimes better, sometimes worse.
Because that’s the way my mind works. I get ideas all the time and I write them down to be used later, but every so often one idea collides with another and I suddenly get really excited and I just have to begin writing.
How much of the path of a book is made up, and how much is fixed by my experience and personality? I feel as if I’m creating when I write, but often when I rewrite I think of a good idea and I include it, only to find a few pages later that I’d already done that on the first draft.
I think that a lot of writing is just improvising around a well established series of chords. To take a Jazz metaphor, we’re all just blowing to “All The Things You Are”.
Basically, I write something every day. I write down ideas, I write down scenes, I write down conversations I’ve overheard on the tram and then I keep redrafting. I’m always writing in time snatched between other responsibilities, but I still need to book in longer stretches when I can draw things together undisturbed.
If you’re interested, there’s lots more on my writing process here on my blog.
And so that’s me done. Here are the next links in the chain, two excellent but very different writers at two very different stages in their careers:
Philip Palmer is a screenwriter, radio dramatist, novelist and producer. His screen credits include THE MANY LIVES OF ALBERT WALKER and THE BILL. For radio his plays include THE KING’S COINER, BLAME, and THE FAERIE QUEENE. As a writer of SF novels he is responsible for considerable galactic carnage; his five published books are DEBATABLE SPACE, RED CLAW, VERSION 43, HELLSHIP and ARTEMIS. Philip is the founder of Afan Films.
He has a part time role as a lecturer at the London Film School, on the MA Screenwriting course.
Fletcher Moss was an Alderman of Manchester who upon his death over a century ago, bequeathed a beautiful botanical gardens to the people of the city; a noble and generous gesture. This Fletcher Moss has significantly less to recommend him – he’s an Assistant Headteacher at a school in Greater Manchester who needed a pseudonym for the writing he fits in between lesson planning, marking and rattling around the M60 in his second-hand Citroen. The Poison Boy (2013) is his debut novel. The Night Wardens (2015, fingers crossed…) is on the way
In case you missed it: Civilian Reader Interview
Part of the Dream London Blog Tour.
Follow the links to see, amongst other things, me talking about SF and Blood and Iron
I’ve just received my author’s copy of the BSFA’s Twenty Years, Two Surveys – a book that compares SF and Fantasy writers responses to a questionnaire now and twenty years ago. It’s a fascinating read, if you’re interested in that sort of thing.
Here, for the record, are my responses. If you want to know what other writers are thinking, buy the book.
1. Do you consider yourself a writer of science fiction and/or fantasy?
Nearly exclusively SF.
2. What is it about your work that makes it fit into these categories?
My definition of SF
The last probably needs some explanation. Consider a book such as The Time Travellers Wife by Audrey Niffenegger. Whilst an entertaining read with many Sfnal elements in it, I don’t think there was anything genuinely new in her treatment of the idea of Time Travel. This is not a problem, the book works well as a romance with a touch of SF in the background. Granted, if you took away the Time Travel the story wouldn’t work, so by Pohl’s definition it’s a Science Fiction story, but I would argue that ideas such as Time Travel have expanded out of SF and into the mainstream (think about all those James Bond films with a Science Fiction weapon as the plot driver). This is why I think SF needs to be cutting edge. If we keep going around and around the same ideas and not adding anything new, then we are missing that indefinable part of the genre that we all recognise from when we first began to read SF aged 11 or 12.
I try to I bring something new or cutting edge in my writing (although I am sure there will be many who claim to have seen it all before) but I attempt to bring something new in my treatment of SF themes. Whether I succeed or not is down to others to decide.
3. Why have you chosen to write science fiction or fantasy?
I didn’t choose to write SF, it chose me. It’s the extrapolation thing: there is something in my nature that looks at a dragon, a ray gun or a love affair and thinks “Now how or why would that work?” (and if the answer is it wouldn’t, I write a story about something else.)
4. Do you consider there is anything distinctively British about your work, and if so what is it?
I’ve just spent ten minutes using Google to try and find a half remembered George Orwell quote where he said something along the lines of being English means you remember the smell of mutton cooking from your childhood. Maybe you know the quote. Getting to the point, I think that SF should be about getting away from the certainties of childhood. I think that those certainties and habits instilled at an early age are what makes us British or French or Japanese or whatever. They are fascinating, they should be examined, but they are not what SF is about.
Saying all that, my characters tend not to understand what is going on, they can’t explain how the world they inhabit works, and they respond to, rather than shape events. I think this is more a British trait than American.
5. Do British settings play a major part in your work, and if so, why
(or why not)?
I return to two settings in my work: South Street, a reflection of parts of the East End of London where I used to live, and Bridleworth, a reflection of the area of the North West where I now reside.
Much of my work is set on other worlds, so mostly the question does not apply, but two of my short story cycles are set in the near future, and I anchored them in the two locations above so as to lend them familiarity, to contrast the strangeness of the SF with normality of everyday life. As they were what I knew best, I set them where I lived. They were British settings, then, because I am British and they reflect my unspoken assumptions and my unconscious prejudices. They are not intended to be an examination of Britishness, rather a realistic backdrop against which the SF plays out.
6. What do you consider are the major influences on your work?
Diana Wynne Jones, for making me want to write
Chris Beckett, for his way of getting everything out of an idea,
J.L. Carr for giving me an appreciation of how every word can count
Larry Niven, for his logical, structured approach
The two Davids, Lodge and Nobbs for showing that character is not enough, it is the interactions between characters that make a story and
Pat Mills for his breadth of influence
7. Do you detect a different response to your science fiction/fantasy between publishers in Britain and America (or elsewhere)?
Every time I think I’ve noted a different response, something comes along to change my mind. In my experience it is the individual editors’ responses, regardless of their nationality, that are very different .
8. Do you detect a different response to your science fiction/fantasy
between the public in Britain and America (or elsewhere)?
The Americans are more vocal!
Apart from that, I really don’t know.
9. What effect should good science fiction or fantasy have upon the reader?
Good SF should make the reader realise the world is a much weirder place than they first thought, that their life so far has been very narrow and provincial, and, most importantly, it should make them want to get out there and understand our place in the Universe and not to accept anything but the truth for an answer.
10. What do you consider the most significant weakness in science fiction and fantasy as a genre?
Not a weakness as such, but there are some SF stories that have to be told in simple, straightforward style if the reader is to follow them. Stories told in such a prosaic way can be dismissed by those seeking a more literary style, however I feel they are missing the point. I feel we are failing as a genre for not successfully communicating our aims to the wider public. Worse, we fall into the trap of trying include elements or styles into our work that don’t need to be there.
An example would be the recent series of Dr Who. I heard episodes being praised for their treatment of character, relationships and romance. The Science Fictional element was mentioned rarely, if at all. Now, it could be argued that the programs were family entertainment, not Science Fiction, and this is fair enough, but good Science Fiction has additional elements to character and style. You can remove the latter two and still have good Science Fiction. We should give more recognition to that fact and not slavishly try to emulate the mainstream.
11. What do you think have been the most significant developments in
British science fiction and fantasy over the past twenty years?
The growing professionalism of the small press, and the quality of the product they produce. The internet may change things in the future, but the physical press is still the goal of most writers, and the medium of choice for readers. Two major prizes have been won this year by books published by small presses (Arthur C Clarke- Ian McLeod and Edge Hill Short Story- Chris Beckett) I think we are going to see more of this in the future.